CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of -5.68% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 19.01%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 12.16% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.76%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.58%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.943%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $332.2M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Celsius Holdings's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.40x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 5.30x versus 6.37x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of -5.68% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 14.94%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 12.16% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.76%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.4254 which suggests that it could fall by -0.66%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.833%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $332.2M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Celsius Holdings's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.40x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 35.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 5.30x versus 7.68x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of -5.68% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 5.48%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 12.16% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.76%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $163.37 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than PepsiCo.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $332.2M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Celsius Holdings's net income of -$18.9M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.40x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 5.30x versus 2.24x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of -5.68% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of -14.61%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 12.16% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -38.47%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.11, signalling upside risk potential of 28.76%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 87.69%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $332.2M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $39.5M. Celsius Holdings's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.40x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 5.30x versus 0.84x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.